Blog

Neuroethology of Predation: How Animals Use Sensory Cues to Hunt and Avoid Predators

Book Title: Transformative Approaches in Multidisciplinary Research (TAMR)

Chief Editors: Dr. Meenakshi Kujur, and Dr. Hamidun Bunawan

Associate Editors: Mr. Gunjit Singhal, and Dr. Asma Farooque

Co-Editors: Dr. Suresh Kamarapu, and Dr. Souvik Sur

Chapter: 5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59646/672/5

Author: Dr. Hiren Madhukar Dekate

Abstract

Neuroethology is the study of how natural behaviour in animals is created by the nervous systems of animals in reaction to environmental factors, especially in predation. The research paper discusses the ways in which animals use the sensory clues like sight, smell, hearing, mechanoreception and electroreception to sense prey and control predators. The research takes a comparative literature-based method incorporating the outcomes of experimental neuroscience, behavioural ecology, and field studies on ethology to learn how neural circuits process sensory information in hunting and escapes behaviours. The findings suggest that species are specialized with respect to the type of sensory systems they use, based on their ecological niches: predators like lions, hawks, and sharks have a higher level of sensory integration to detect movement, scent, and vibration, whereas prey species like rodents, insects and fish have a greater reliance on early-warning systems and rapid threat detection systems. The results also indicate that predation-related behaviours involve a highly adaptable neural processing that enables animals to maximize survival by enabling them to make quick decisions and sensorimotor coordination. Some of the important areas in the brain include the optic tectum in birds and fish, the olfactory bulb in mammals, and special mechanosensory pathways in aquatic organisms; these areas are very essential in the interpretation of environmental messages. Moreover, evolutionary forces have also driven both types of species (predators and prey) in an endless loop of sensory evolution, and counter-evolution, known as the arms race in evolutionary biology. Another important aspect discussed in the paper is the role of environmental factors (complexity of habitat, availability of light, sound propagation) in determining how sensory dependence and hunting behaviours. Realizing neuroethological processes will give a better idea of the animal cognition, survival tactics, and ecosystem processes. This work has relevance to the general behavioural neuroscience in terms of the interaction between sensory processing and neural circuitry to generate complex predatory and anti-predatory behaviour in the animal kingdom.Keywords: Neuroethology, Predation, Sensory Cues, Animal Behaviour, Neural Circuits, Predator-Prey Interaction, Evolutionary Adaptation, Sensory Processing, Behavioural Neuroscience, Survival Strategies.

References

  1. Ewert, J. P. (1987). Neuroethology of releasing mechanisms: Prey-catching in toads. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 10(3), 337–368. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023158](https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023158)
  2. Zupanc, G. K. H. (2010). Behavioural Neurobiology: An Integrative Approach. Oxford University Press.
  3. Dusenbery, D. B. (1992). Sensory Ecology: How Organisms Acquire and Respond to Information. W.H. Freeman.
  4. Stevens, M. (2013). Sensory ecology, behaviour, and evolution. Oxford University Press.
  5. Heiligenberg, W. (1991). Neural nets in electric fish. MIT Press.
  6. Bullock, T. H., Hopkins, C. D., Popper, A. N., & Fay, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). Electroreception. Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28275-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28275-0)
  7. Endler, J. A. (1991). Interactions between predators and prey. In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (3rd ed.). Blackwell Scientific.
  8. Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68(4), 619–640. [https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092](https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092)
  9. Farris, S. M. (2013). Evolution of complex higher brain centers and behaviours. Brain, Behaviour and Evolution, 82(1), 9–18. [https://doi.org/10.1159/000351609](https://doi.org/10.1159/000351609)
  10. Catania, K. C. (2012). Evolution of brains and behaviour for optimal foraging: A tale of two predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Supplement 1), 10701–10708. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201882109](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201882109)
  11. Yager, D. D. (2012). Predator detection and evasion by flying insects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(2), 201–207. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.12.011](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.12.011)
  12. Rosenthal, G. G. (2017). Mate Choice: The Evolution of Sexual Decision Making from Microbes to Humans. Princeton University Press.
  13. Land, M. F., & Nilsson, D.-E. (2012). Animal Eyes (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  14. Dangles, O., & Casas, J. (2019). Ecosystem services provided by insects for achieving sustainable development goals. Ecosystem Services, 35, 109–115. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.002)
  15. Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? Current Biology, 19(21), R995–R1008. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.023](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.023)
  16. Hartline, P. H., Kass, L., & Loop, M. S. (1978). Merging of modalities in the optic tectum: Infrared and visual integration in snakes. Science, 199(4332), 1225–1229. [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.628837](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.628837)